View Single Post
Old 09-02-2022, 11:23 AM   #1620
speede5
First Line Centre
 
speede5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Sutton View Post
I agree with whay you've said, but I can also get behind this luxury tax and wish it would go further. Quads, RV's, vacation homes are only a few examples of what other luxurious items that this tax should apply to. I believe in an increase in taxing consumption over increase in taxing income as those who spend more should have more disposable income and there far fewer loopholes.
See when you get into that you are only hurting the middle class. People who've saved over their lifetime for one extravagance in their retirement, maybe an RV to tour around in, a small aircraft to enjoy, or a cool car to cruise in. This won't hurt the rich who can lease these items on a business and have a dozen loopholes.

Luxury taxes are sold to the poor saying anything they can't afford is a luxury but they should be based more on the income of the purchaser than the cost of the item.
speede5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to speede5 For This Useful Post: