View Single Post
Old 08-22-2022, 08:33 AM   #392
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default Flames Not Yet Done - More to Come? Possible D for F?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
I think part of the argument is that Anderson and Hanifin couldn’t handle the top line of Edmonton .

So if they can’t play first pairing D in playoffs why not move one for forward help .

Depth D doesn’t matter if the depth can’t stop the oppositions best players

We didn’t loose against Edmonton because Stone was forced to play .

Now if the team believes one or both of Anderson and Hanifin have another level still you can absolutely run them out there again. If the team believes either has peaked looking to acquire a similarly aged and skills forward makes sense

I’m not following the logic here?

The D wasn’t good enough so let’s make it worse in the name of adding to the forward group?

Besides, Hanifin and Andersson we’re awesome all season long. Trading one of them away because you weren’t happy with a 5 game sample at the end of the year isn’t a great idea.

Last edited by bax; 08-22-2022 at 08:37 AM.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bax For This Useful Post: