RE: Pirro’s desire to know why the DOJ and FBI “did this.”
Donald Trump (or at least his lawyer) is in possession of a signed warrant which must, by law, spell out the following:
1) What crime, specifically, is being investigated.
2) What evidence, specifically, the FBI expected to find in his house.
3) Why the FBI expected to find this evidence in his house.
4) Why a search and seizure was necessary, ie: what reasons the FBI felt the evidence might be destroyed, removed, distributed, etc. necessitating the immediate removal of said evidence.
It would also indicate which federal judge was convinced by the FBI to sign said warrant.
Trump is well within his rights to release this document to the public at anytime. It would really be improper for either the DOJ or the FBI to release information or comment on this investigation. It rarely happens in criminal cases: the prosecution and the police don’t comment, information about the case almost always comes from the defense.
|