Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Flames Round Two stats ...
5 on 5
CF% 57.49% (3rd of 8)
xGF% 53.2% (3rd)
SCF% 55.5% (3rd)
HDCF% 55.6% (3rd)
Sh% 10.56% (2nd to Edmonton)
Sav% 84.3% (8th/last)
All situations
CF% 56.5% (3rd of 8)
xGF% 51.7% (4th)
SCF% 53.3% (4th)
HDCF% 52.0% (4th)
Sh% 10.58% (4th)
Sav% 85.3% (8th/last)
I'm not going to go down the Edmonton (wasn't really a sweep) road, but to suggest it was a lopsided series is tough to support.
Having said that ... I do think there is a difference in high danger chances, something that will likely be the next level of advanced stats. If they existed today I think higher high danger + better execution of said chances was firmly in the Oiler corner.
If they could track that I would think the truth of why Edmonton won in 5 games would pop out.
|
It felt lopsided after after losing the lead in game 2. I think it goes to your quality of chances point. With the ability to track the puck maybe we see some data about what is happening right before a shot that would correlate with danger. As well as speed of shot maybe.