Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
I don't think it's nearly that black and white.
I suspect that ownership had involvement in both decisions, which could run the range of approving the decisions, influencing the decisions or dictating the decisions. Only BT and the owners know where on that line things sit. But for decisions of that magnitude I suspect they were involved.
But you are coloring things by calling it "Murray's decision to hire Sutter" because that best suits your narrative.
|
How much does this even matter, since it seems abundantly clear that both ownership and Treliving were lock-step in the decision to hire Sutter? It is difficult to imagine that Treliving could have survived this long if he was bypassed by ownership.
Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk