View Single Post
Old 08-07-2022, 02:17 AM   #3192
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
It's been suggested that the Panthers weren't expecting to be able to re-sign Huberdeau. If so, they were giving up their leading scorer for one year only, just as the Flames were giving up one year of Tkachuk. I think they were foolish to add Weegar to the deal, but it's clear that they valued one young core player over two older ones.

Sorry. How does this work again?

Panthers not expecting to be able to re-sign a guy, when they trade him for another guy and then sign that guy for max term at a comparable amount?

Sounds confusing
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote