Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
I'm not sure going long term with Kylington was the right play either. Nevertheless, I don't think it should be called excellent work by the GM, it's a deal that had to be made and I don't think either side came out ahead or behind where they were expected.
Personally, I would have dealt him to try and shore up the top 6. Maybe alone he doesn't get that done, but it would be the best path to giving the Flames real scoring depth again.
|
I'd guess it's far easier to trade Kylington signed for 2 years than unsigned heading into arb.