Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Anyone else slightly alarmed that Mr. Coffee can’t read what posts actually say and instead makes up his own version of what was said?
|
I agree with you about the civil suit thing, that she can and should go pursue that, but you made a comment early on in the discussion that basically said you're pretty sure he's still guilty 'based on facts and other data and stuff' (paraphrase). This struck me as a weird position for a lawyer but I guess we'll just have to take your word that you have far more experience / knowledge in the field than I/we do, and we should all just assume he still did it even though a court just rendered a
Not Guilty verdict.
With this logic, at what point would Virtanen ever be viewed as truly innocent in the public eye? What, there is just no recovering or restoration of reputation after being dragged through this process ever then for him?
^^ Doesn't sound like true 'justice' to me.