Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
I bet a guilty verdict wouldn’t have many arguing what it meant.
|
Probably because in that scenario he would have been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That means that there was no reason out before the jury that would cause a reasonable person to think there was a possibility that he was not guilty. By implication that would mean someone saying he was criminally not guilty would be unreasonable. None of that changes the fact that not guilty does not equal innocent.