Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
Well, I am functionally illiterate, so I’m sure I don’t understand the distinction.
If he did it, and there was evidence to convict him and send him to prison, he’d have been sent to prison.
Do you want to live in a country where the testimony of one person, absent all other physical or forensic evidence, is enough to send another person to prison?
And if so, why?
|
There wasn't enough evidence to convict him. Period, end of sentence.
Doesn't mean he did it or didn't do it.
OJ wasn't criminally guilty, either.