Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
Lastly, the bible has proven to be historically accurate. Its description of geography and events have been right on the money. The Bible has also been held to a higher standard of criticism then other historical documents. Even with its remarkable track record it is still presumed to be inaccurate when another outside source isn't found to collaborate its claim.
|
No. No it's not. No one uses the bible as history record except Christians. The bible has not been "on the money" with it's accounts of the past. Remember exodus? You think they would have found some evidence of thousands of people wandering the desert. But they haven't found any that would confirm this part of the bible. No creditable scientist uses the bible as fact for the past. You are mistaken.