Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
Absent other evidence of course. A player might crack and give a different version.
Query why a settlement was offered with such overwhelming evidence? I assume because there was some thought the "evidence" didn't quite add up.
|
Because Hockey Canada paid to have it 'go away'.
Its two separate issues.
The players - who would be criminally responsible - didn't settle.
Hockey Canada wouldn't have any criminal responsibility - settled to avoid the bad PR/civil lawsuits.
Both the players and Hockey Canada did something scummy that much is known.