Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Well, as much as I think they bungled, I think this aspect is not being interpreted right. They have a fund for unexpected costs. When asked they said, yeah that would include these kind of claims. It would also cover other kinds of claims or even costs which aren’t claims per se. IOW It’s not a sexual assault fund.
|
It is weird that they would go to the wall to fight the guy who was partially paralyzed in a Hockey Canada game but they moved very quickly to cover the costs of something that could be damaging to their reputation but had nothing to do with something that happened on the ice.