Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Possibly Fox?
You pass on a future Norris winner that you can trade for another asset for a player that likely doesn't play at all?
The next ten players taken after Fox are highlighted by the Rem Pitlick. That's it.
This literally makes zero sense.
|
And fox himself returned almost 0 value for us. In the Hamilton Ferland for Lindholm Hanifin swap Hamilton was the best player to date in that trade. We got 2 worse pieces (at the time, lindholm has grown his game a ton since then, hanifin to a lesser extent) than Hamilton and also gave up Ferland who was below the 2 guys we traded for. Fox was a minor sweetener at thar time.