[QUOTE=Jiri Hrdina;8371211]This logic is flawed.
Teams acquire these players to win the cup.
But only 1 team can win a cup.
Therefore rentals always look bad - except for the team that wins it.
The Avs?
I dont give a flying F what the Avs did.
This is a thread about Jarnkrok.
Here is my work! Jarnkrok was known to suck during the playoffs. Do your work.
4 goals and 19 points -13 in 75 playoff games over 8 years.
That is almost a full season of playoff hockey under his belt.
We gave up 3 picks for him for one goal in 29 games. His stats say we were lucky to even get one goal from him. Yet we got that one goal. Which aligns with his stats and previous performance in the playoffs.
We gave up a 2nd a 3rd and a 7th round pick for the guy and have nothing to show for it. We even lost the player we traded for.
That is horrible asset management. Not a player to rely on in the playoffs.
How could anyone logically think this was a good move?
Jarnkrok played exactly as expected in the playoffs. Exactly as expected.
His stats tell the story for his entire hockey career.
Please dont use the Pepsifree we agree to disagree.
We got exactly what we traded for. Gave up huge assets for no good reason.
This guy was not putting us over the edge to be a contender.
|