Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee
Yeah that leaves a little bit of wiggle room for Dube to basically be like not explicitly involved but possibly in the room as a witness or not in the room at all but having heard about it or knew it was going on or something like that.
But yeah. Not clear who was involved specifically.
|
It’s not even that far. It’s “not involved in any wrongdoing”. Maybe because they say the police not pressing charges = no wrongdoing. If he said “not involved in the incident” or “not involved in the alleged wrongdoing” I’d be more comfortable.
The one thing I noticed is that a bunch of them were referred to as giving the response “above” which was basically the lawyer letter. But Dube’s was given separately (though it sounded almost identical).