Dubé statement is interesting in how they zeroed in the on the word 'wrongdoing'.
In very carefully worded statements like this I think it is fair to try to read the tea-leaves...compared to Makar's statement which expressly denies being "involved in any way". It certainly seems to leave a little wiggle-room that Dubé was 'involved', but not the 'wrongdoer'.
Of course this is pure speculation and it might just be a poorly written statment. But the threat of defamation also feels a bit like doth protest too much...
|