[Goriders]

Originally Posted by GioforPM

Most NDAs have a clause that say if the person signing is forced to testify they haven’t breached the NDA. But the other side will go to court to try and use the NDA to prevent the testimony. If it’s important enough the court will weigh the pros and cons of it. The importance of the evidence in that case versus the policy of honouring NDAs in general.

They can also modify things like hold the session in camera and seal the transcripts. If the NDA is about reputation that solves it.

Thanks for clarifying.