Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
Double that, because Tkachuk is very likely going to demand the same deal.
|
The way this is all going I wouldn't be shocked if we had to trade Tkachuk just to be able to realistically fill out the roster the next few years until some other contracts expire that we can't realistically trade our way out of before we're signing other big UFA deals.
Granted if we can instead find a reasonable trade for Lucic, Monahan, Coleman, Mangiapane, etc... and replace them with cheaper options. Then sure, bring on the matching deal for MTk.