Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
Okay, well I think we're on the same page if you're acknowledging what we've seen so far isn't very exciting. Hopefully cooler stuff comes out with time.
I guarantee if I had posted that first pic here without context it was a new photo from the latest and greatest telescope people would have scrolled on by oblivious to the fact it was the best photo of the distant universe so far since it is way too similar to a million photos we've all seen before.
|
Without context??? Well, of course. The context is a large part in what makes the image what it is.
If the context of Hubble’s deep field was “this is it, nothing is passed what we see”, then Webbs deep field would be visually mind blowing. But we knew there was more, we were taught in schools there was more.
If your argument is that you’re more impressed by fictional drawings or graphics than by reality then I guess that’s the end of the debate. But at this point it feels like you’re just poking around expressing how unimpressed you are with the topic of the thread. So, you can avoid it, or be open minded to the context and maybe be impressed.