Quote:
Originally Posted by jjgallow
Look I'm sorry man but Schnieder is already one of the most valuable prospects in the NHL and on the verge of becoming a 21 year old impact NHLer, RHD.
Basically what we were missing when we lost these playoffs.
We can say it's too early to tell and whatever, but the writing's on the wall when Schnieder, a D, beats Zary, a forward, to the NHL and makes big contributions to boot.
Let's not even pretend we don't know what the value is of an effective 20 year old RHD NHLer, and what the projection/ceiling is on that.
No need for a rant, it's more than a valid count, and looks a little worse each year.
|
I most certainly didn't rant. You just like to change your argument when someone points out the holes in it.
All good - you do you.
I found this interesting:
Defenseman A:
An outstanding offensive defenseman, he is a natural with the puck and a great power-play quarterback option at any level. Loves to jump up into the play and act as a fourth forward on the ice. Also owns fairly projectable size. Needs a lot of work as a defender, including his coverage skills when he does not have the puck as well as his overall positioning. Could also stand to utilize his body more to deter opponents from setting up shop in the attacking zone. Is somewhat raw and unrefined as a defenseman but oozes talent and point production.
Long Range Potential: Raw, talented offensive defenseman with good upside.
Defenseman B:
Has the size, skating ability, right-handed shot, poise and defensive chops to play big minutes at the National Hockey League level (for a very long time). Does not have high-end offensive acumen but that does not prevent him from logging a ton of ice time in all game situations. Also displays a physical side to his game that helps his team win hockey games. He may not be the prototypical "modern-day" defenseman, but NHL teams cannot win Stanley Cups without his type.
Long Range Potential: Big, solid shutdown defenseman.
Defenseman B reminds me of Tanev, while Defenseman A reminds me of a Fox type (
NOT a direct comparison, just a type).
I bet you can guess who they are, but if you can't, see below.