View Single Post
Old 07-04-2022, 12:56 PM   #1251
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chubeyr1 View Post
I think that is really stretching the word fleeced.

Hamilton was the star player in that trade. At the time Ferland was also a physical 20-20 player. Fox was expected to make any teams opening night nhl roster.

Calgary gave up the better players at the time and a massive prospect.

How would you evaluate that trade if Hamilton re ups with them.
Ferland is healthy and re ups with them. Fox signs with Carolina?


I think you could say Calgary got fleeced on that trade. We gave up more than we got in return.

That said I understand why Calgary made the trade. Ferland would of been tough to sign because of cap, Hamilton was a culture change, and Fox would not sign here.

It worked out for Calgary. I would not say fleeced though.
None of that matters because none of that happened.

That’s like arguing; ‘what if Lindholm put up two 50 goal seasons and Hanifin was a Norris candidate year after year?’

As it stands today, the Hurricanes have very little to show for a C who just finished second in Selke voting and a quality top 4 D, or better, on nearly any team in the league, if not every team.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TOfan For This Useful Post: