Quote:
Originally Posted by Agamemnon
I guess I'd have to see the rulebook where calling another MLA a liar is 'against the rules' and results in expulsion from the Legislature.
If the Con's are innocent, why not just make the guy look like a fool by showing he's wrong in implicating them of corruption? Wouldn't that be a more effective defence than expelling him? Makes them look bad, imo.
|
He didn't call him a liar, he called him a thief, and that's slander. Whether in the ledge or not, buddy could get sued over it.