Quote:
Originally Posted by fleury
The outrage of this based on the slippery slope argument is so silly. This isn’t the end of the world and the United States isn’t going to become Saudi Arabia despite the hyperbole out there. Personally I like the idea of counter arguments for and against this ruling. You have to draw the line somewhere on that you establish life. And despite the argument that men are determining womens rights the question to me is there are consequences for the man as well. Child support payments. With reference to rape and incest situations, what percentage of those are there? Should there be exemptions for this type situations? I really wish people went back to debating these subjects because lines have to be drawn somewhere. Can’t have people aborting at 5 months or something. I’ve recently spoke to a few people who did have them and the reasoning seemed pretty Willynilly which really perked up my ears and made me think hard. There should be consequences to actions for men and women equally, no?
|
Okay, so if you were a 19-year-old woman and became pregnant, you would choose to keep the baby. Fair enough. What isn't fair is taking away the ability for somebody else to choose. If you don't like abortions, don't get one. But STFU about deciding what somebody else chooses to do with their uterus. It's none of your business.
Nobody is pro abortion, necessarily. They are pro choice.