Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor
Didn't something like 70% of their caucus vote to restrict abortion in an attempt to prevent sex-selective abortions?
|
Placing the rights of future women over the rights of current women.
It’s a bit of a red herring in that in terms of absolute numbers very few of these abortions occur. But let’s also not categorize this with access to abortion in general as the people getting sex selective abortions are people who want a child, and who believe this baby to be a child, but if it’s genitalia is not correct will murder it. In this case murder is the correct term to use because the person getting the abortion believes it to be a baby with a future if it’s male.
Now are a good portion of the 70% just anti-abortion zealots? Probably. Is this being used to drive a wedge? Absolutely.