Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacopuck
This is something that I think could greatly improve government and legislation.
Any legislation that is tied to funding of any program, organization, office, ect.. should have KPI's as part of the legislation with consequences of not meeting said KPIs outlined. Obviously the set up of the KPI's can be politically driven but at least the public could then argue if the KPI is of value or BS.
Your department doesn't meet your KPI's without reasonable justification, YOU GET THE AXE.
It will never happen, but one can dream.
|
I would like to see when a program is created of legislation that it has specific time lines and budgets attached, and yeah if your lagging, going massively over budget, then there's a mechanism for replacement beyond the pleasure of the Prime Minister.
Or if your department loses billions, like the Infrasture bank under McKenna, I mean frankly she should have been fired for that alone.
The latest on the tree planting program is once again not one tree was planted, but millions were spent on salaries. That Minister should be hauled in front of a committee with the idea of censor or termination.
Ethical violations in the house should be massive fines to the party, and instant termination of the MP responsible.
I also think that it should be put into place that when you pass through the doors of the house the first time that when you represent the government of Canada and you are under oath, and if you purjure or mislead then a house disciplinary committee can fine you or make you stand in the house and apologize on the public record and possibly be fired.
The access to information rules have to be reformed to, that's a whole nest of vipers right now and a complete gong show.
We can talk about these people being underpaid. But lets be honest when you look at the salaries of MP's and cabinet members and committee members, and combine it with the benefits and perks and expense accounts, they're really not. If they get into government strictly for pay and perks btw, then they're the wrong people for the job.
I also honestly think because of what we see from MP's that they should have to do an IQ test and be evaluated by a fricken psychologist before they're allowed to take their seat, because it feels like there are a lot of at least sociopaths and more so generally lazy and incompetent people in key roles of power, that work in government.
Part of this is obviously in jest. But the conduct of our governments no matter what the party in power, and the conduct of the individuals is kinda gross.