Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyB
Yeah, so....
I disagree that we engineered the complexities into it or that we can just change them if we want to. I don't see that as credible.
I was pretty honest, beginning by asking a question to clarify your position. You're responding with a condescending and impolite tone, but I don't actually see you writing anything that makes me find you particularly thoughtful or credible. I'm not wasting time on that. Enjoy your day.
|
Some valuable differences in how we ask for clarification there. You got the answer you asked for, but didn't ask for the clarification you needed and still went off on it anyway. Can't fix that for you.
But to the topic, let me get this straight (if you respond, if not, whatever), you don't think we engineered the complexities into a system we created every single part of and you don't think we can change them if we want to? So, what's the point of recognizing that they're complex? If we didn't create the complexity and can't change it, what are we doing? Just noting "hey, it's complex, nothing we can do about that complexity though"? Cool. Exciting. How did the systems become complex, then? Who or what created the rules that govern the systems that have lead to their complexity? Understanding that, to me, is the basics. If you think the basics are way further back than that, just "it's complex" then yeah, this is not going to be a productive conversation.
And hey, you enjoy your day as well. I don't particularly care how you waste your time, but thanks for wasting a little more of it to tell me off
