Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
No, it's not. Yes, on average men are bigger and stronger than women, but that's just an average. It's no more "irresponsible and dangerous" than letting Zdeno Chara play against Johnny Gaudreau. That size difference is much bigger than the average size difference of biological men and women.
|
It's so much more than size: it's testosterone levels, muscle structure, bone density, reaction times, grip strength, etc. The athletic gap between men and women is staggering once you start looking at the data. Put Johnny in a womens league and he gets 20 points every night without trying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
No, it's not conceivable that that could happen, not at this pace. There are still vanishingly few transgender athletes, and even fewer of them are in any way dominant.
"Sounds like" and "Usually pretty obvious" are terrible measurements. Obviously you're not going to notice the non-obvious cases, and just in general you can't start checking people's genitals on wishywashy ideas like this.
|
No issues here, this all looks good to you? No women are being harmed? #### those bitches for not standing with that heroic trans-women?
Quote:
First of all, "obvious cases of biological men" needing to be "rooted out" is not a thing to begin with, and second, a genital check does not help. Here's an example of someone who would be categorized as a woman based on a genital check, Buck Angel.
As long as people are not competing with genitals, there's no point in checking the genitals.
|
Again, there are 0 instances of biological women competing at a high level with men.
e: homeboy is 5'8 and probably no more than 140-150 lb. lol.