Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi
Recollection can falter but the truth doesn’t change. There’s a difference between forgetting something and having a constantly changing version of the events.
Your entire argument here seems predicated on believing everything she says, despite the fact that she was caught on multiple occasions at worst lying or at best being intentionally misleading while under oath. Not sure how one could expect to have a good faith discussion with you when that is your position in spite of all the evidence.
|
I think the evidence shows that people can be confused and have different recollections of events, especially when dealing with violent or traumatic circumstances.
I don't think that Amber Heard is innocent of abuse, and I do think there were likely instances where she embellished or lied. But I do believe that there is too much evidence, as mentioned in the final paragraph I posted above, to outright dismiss her claims that Depp was abusive.
Depp's team did a great job controlling the narrative as well having a jury trial that was not immune to a media circus. I think they made a very complicated and messy situation look a lot more one sided than it actually was.