Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam
The problem is not the rules. You can write rules and rules and more rules.
The problem are the people interpreting the rules.
You think you can write enough rules that it functions like a pachinko machine and that then you can place any ol' person into the role and then viola, consistent results!
You're basically going for the flat tax approach, when there's simply too many edge cases that need to be accounted for.
|
The problem is both. Write better rules so the buffoons have less leeway to bungle it. Implement better standards/practices so the buffoons have less leeway to bungle it (ie. conclusive in 2 minutes or else call on ice stands).