Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
Every human being a collection of biases, the ability to look beyond your biases when presented when information is provided to you is what makes someone objective.
Two questions that should be answered to be completely objective in this case: - Does a pledge for a charitable donation prevent a person from being a domestic abuser?
- Does substance abuse automatically make person a liar?
This judge decided yes for both questions and prevented the evidence from being presented to show would have "no" to both questions. That's not an assumption, its based on court records and judge statements from the UK case itself. |
This is a civil case? These things just basiscally boil down to who can persuade the judge/jury the best. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" doesn't apply, and these cases aren't really the greatest as precedent in future cases.