Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
You didn't pay attention at all. UK judge accepted Amber's "evidence" about being abused at face value and there wasn't the scrutiny to it because she was "basically good for donating to charity". All of which were proven false in the US case in both cross and Amber's own statements and expert testimony. The judge threw out almost all evidence presented of domestic abuse against Depp because he was a drug user. Both central decision points against Depp in the UK case were shown to be false when the evidence was allowed. Judge made a personal decision on who he thought was more believable without allowing evidence presented that Amber had lied, there's gotta be some bias there.
https://7news.com.au/entertainment/c...rial-c-7023188 |
Seems pretty bold to assume a judge is biased.