Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
According the the NHL rules it only mentions conclusive evidence being required in the coaches challenge. My read of the other sections it doesn’t discuss the level of evidence required to over turn the call on the ice.
|
shows how clueless I am - I thought the 'conclusive' proof to overturn was a long ensconced concept, predating the coaches challenge- did it go away then once the coaches challenge became a thing- or was it never a thing to begin with?
video review began in 91 and coaches challenges in 2015? am I the only one who has been wandering around with this idea of conclusive evidence wrongly for years?