https://twitter.com/user/status/1530232100640608256
Nope. Still doesn't explain how it is a "distinct kicking motion". Saying it doesn't make it so.
IMO, the way the rule is drafted is sufficient; the problem is that the interpretation of "distinct kicking motion" has been established such that all of the goals that have been shown have "some" kicking motion but apparently not a "distinct" kicking motion. If you want to eliminate all goals where there is "any" kicking motion then change the rule and enforce it that way. But don't interpret it one way and then change course when it's late in the third period of a tied playoff game and the ruling on the ice is a goal.