Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Here's to me the piss off.
Goal is scored - Good goal by the on ice officials
Edmonton doesn't challenge it
League calls in, takes like 8 minutes of pain staking review and slow down and conversations (I think it was 8 minutes but wasn't holding a stop watch).
Look to me if you need to take 8 minutes to review, you're looking for reasons to over turn it, and making up a narrative. I think there needs to be a timer on the review. If you can't decide in a minute of two of video you're looking for something that is so inconsequential that its making shyte up.
|
I don't think a time limit on reviews makes things any better. I want to refs and the league to make the right call. I don't know how things work in the war room but I understand there are multiple cameras and sometimes multiple feeds from different broadcasts and the different angles need to be stitched together to make the right call and I'm assuming that takes some amount of time. If they need 3 or 4 minutes to get all the evidence put together and reviewed so be it. Yes, it slows down the game but they need to make the right call. The decision making process and standards to for the call is what should be questioned and interrogated more than the length of the process.