You are pretty quick to throw the, "You've been lied to." in there.
Would you care to substantiate your claim that scientists "routinely take multiply test samples and throw out those that are wild"? That sort of thing wouldn't pass peer review, so I'm curious about this happening "routinely".
And substantiation from a website that states "Upholding the authority of the bible from the very first verse" can hardly be considered unbiased.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|