Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon@Dec 22 2004, 11:22 AM
Quote:
|
Being responsible for my actions has nothing to do with not being able to buy automatic weapons. It has to do with protecting others from my actions. The reason those types of weapons are illegal is so that someone who is inclined to do so can't (in theory) go get a machine gun and shoot up a city street, it has nothing to do with not holding people accountalbe (ie not being responsible for their own actions). If I circumvent the law and get that gun, you can bet I'll be held responsible. That's what laws are for, to protect the public, and to ensure that people are held responsible. Just because something is illegal, doesn't mean I won't do it, but it makes sure that there are consequences if I do, hence I am being held responsible for my own actions.
|
So, basically laws are meant to punish crimes, not prevent them. That doesn't sound appealing, or true. Death-penalty pushers push it (in some cases) because they believe there's a deterrance aspect. If you know you'll die, you won't kill another. The law is not there to simply handle the arrangements after the fact, its supposed to assist in preventing these things... through legislation. What's the difference between shooting up a street with a machine gun or a handgun? You can buy the handgun legally... which mystifies me. A shotgun/rifle I can see a little easier, as they are legitimately used for hunting
|
It all comes down to parents actually giving a crap about their child. I will not kill anyone becuase
A ) I know it is wrong.
B ) It was the way I was raised.
C ) I have respect for human life.
None of this stems from "Well, if I kill someone, I might get the death penalty, so I better not do it." That has nothing to do with it.
The law is there to punish people.