Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
Destroying property generally only counts as civil disobedience if you destroy your own property.
This would be more like violent dissidence, as you're attacking and destroying government property.
However, I do agree that calling it "terrorism" is not the only option.
I would call it domestic terrorism, but I also don't see the word 'terrorism' as inherently negative as most people, so I get why someone would actively want to use a different term.
|
For me the key differentiator is the target of the attack. If you are attacking civilians it’s more likely terrorism. If attacking a military target not.