Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
I always find it hilarious how the people who claim to have known that trades were awful and should get the GM fired don’t speak up until after the players fail to perform.
Interesting how they never post about how crappy the players are when the trades are rumoured or right after they happen.
|
I find it hilarious that people think if a GM makes trades that a message board support it somehow means the move makes sense/was a good move.
I don't think either player is crappy. I was excited to acquire both players and thought they made our team deeper and better.
However, when you 'go for it' and trades assets and the two players you bring in are a non-factor, it is a failure as a GM (And of the players for sure)
There is still lots of time to turn it around. Win Sunday, and maybe one or both gets hot next round and BT made 2 great trades.
However, if we loose on Sunday the performance of these players will play a big part in BT loosing his job. (My opinion is he is out of a job if we loose Sunday)