View Single Post
Old 05-12-2022, 09:41 AM   #436
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
~19 of those deaths would be an award recipient(assuming all unvaxed are willing). We've still got over 1200 in hospital with covid. I still think we would have been much better off waiting a month before we dropped most things, just to get that hospitalization down to 600-800. We'd be in a much better place, and probably saving a lot of money.
What does better place mean?

I agree that potentially we could have saved healthcare dollars by flattening the peak and lengthening the duration. Whether this would have been a good economic or social choice I have no idea

I think the question of would we have saved lives is an open one.

Do you save lives if you can reduce the number of times a person is infected with Covid over their lifetime and does flattening peaks with health measures accomplish this? How best to time boosters with outbreaks? Essentially how to we optimize the infection of the public with each wave of the disease.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote