Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
actually IF you cared to actually read the post in which I posted that info...you will note that I did not suggest they were my beliefs....
actual words were..." What say you about this......(Not my words and not necessarily all of my thoughts)...but certainly thought provoking."
That was it buddy...thought provoking material meant to create a conversation about an OMNIMAX God. As usual you come out with the guns a blazing because the name Cheese precedes the post. Unfortunately you dont own more than a water pistol and your comments are as inane as usual and never add anything of substance to a thread. I dont think I mentioned anything about science in any of these posts...but yes I do believe that science explains FAR more than any religion can hope to...and eventually will be the demise of many religious organizations.
As I keep saying "Prove your premise of a God"....or further any God or son of the same. Im not arguing it...simply asking for information...which you obviously dont have.
Meanwhile you sit on the fence twiddling your fingers...and doing nothing. 
Nice chatting again...for a minute. |
Your beliefs or not, I think I've given a pretty good answer to the "Paradox" that you've presented. Namely that it isn't a paradox.
As for sitting on the fence, I've never said I don't, and I've never said that it makes a whole lot of sense. what I have said and done is that whichever side of the fence you're on (including the top), that you should at least adhear to the values that you claim to hold most important. In your case it's logic and science, in the other case, it's faith and morality, and in my case, I can see that value of science and a good moral center be it prodvided by religion or so called "Humanist" values.
You throw out obscure quotes and arguements, and when someone actually calls you on anything your usual response is. "Hey those aren't my words".
So use your own words for once, and back them up, don't stand behind what someone else argued or said in the hopes that it'll hold up, and safe in the knowledge that you can allways fall back on "I didn't say that".
You say I never add anything of substance to the thread, but you presented (either as yours, or someone elses doesn't matter), an arguement against an OMNIMAX God, and I gave reasons as to why it was logically incorrect, if that isn't adding something I'm not sure exactly what you want.
If refuting and showing the logical error of the statement that you wanted an explination for is not what you were looking for then please explain to me what kind of response you wanted, and I'll try to provide it.