Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
|
Seems like a lot of silly pearl-clutching around this story. I'd be very interested to know exactly how administration presented this to council (any caveats about finality?) and how the $147M figure made it to the media...may have been from simply watching the meeting, where it's possible the media ignored any context/caveats.
CFO may have screwed up on omitting the $38M, but any of the 15 councillors could also have asked about it if they were on top of things.
Ultimately it's a very good story that's now just a good story.