Quote:
Originally Posted by Brendone
Exactly. What Canada does, or doesn’t do has essentially no impact on global warming, so it’s all political posturing. Alberta oil sands are not causing BC wild fires or US droughts. I would guess that at our current emission level, or that of 10 years ago, if we were the world’s worst offender, the world would be in good shape. Until the real offenders do something, we’re probably screwed, but we cripple our economy so we can say Canada tried.
We’re saying Mother Nature is good with the sewage we dump, so if it were proven that Mother Nature can manage Canadian emission levels, does that mean we stop trying?
Now if the research is saying all sewage is net zero, or even improves the oceans environment (i.e. Victorian poop has formed a thriving Coral reef that can survive warming ocean temps) then let’s start shipping all our waste to Victoria, minus all of Slivers baby wipes.
|
Pumping sewage to Victoria would be prohibitively expensive so I don’t get why would you suggest even if it were beneficial.
We know that Canadian C02 emission create a measurable increase in global CO2 so it is not a comparable to Victoria and sewage which does not create a measurable impact.
And as you carry on this ridiculous argument remember that you are currently arguing that because Victoria fixed their sewer problem we should immediately fix our net zero problem and not build pipelines. You are arguing the anti pipeline side.