Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
I believe he's been on the record as free speech on Twitter needs to be defined by the laws in the country it operates in itself. i.e you can say on Twitter what you can legally say in real life and with the same constraints. Seems logical to me and means it isn't 'free speech' as determined by a desk jockey at Twitter, but by law.
I agree in principal but the heck is he going to do with backwards countries will all kinds of regressive laws (Saudi cough cough)
|
Better have a sweet algorithm to hide the garbage that will fit under that definition. Go to one of the chan sites and see how it ends up.