Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
You don't think it's a valid argument?
|
I've posted my thoughts about this in a number of threads, I'm sure. And no, it isn't. The book was written in a language that people could understand 2000 years ago. How far have language and knowledge gone since then? There are things we have now that we didn't have 20 years ago, let alone 2000. You can't take it all literally as many things were written so that they could be understood by those reading (or listening to) them then, as well as now.