Quote:
Originally Posted by kipperfan
Thanks bud...I wil make sure to keep on eye on your post history and you sure as hell better not mispell a single name, place or word or else I will be down your throat telling you that you know nothing about whatever it may be that you errored on. And someone does call him Starbury still.....ME. I guess for guys like you it has to be "cool" and if Jim Rome or Charles Barkley or whomever the heck else doesnt use a certain reference anymore you have to drop it....fine, but me personally I think for myself, and if I hear something I like...I will stick with it...thanks for the tip though.
Very good. Now your getting the point...the talent is very even because like the Lakers, the Grizz dont have a franchise player that can lead the team when they need it most.
|
Hey, no sweat. If you wanna stalk my posts, be my guest. If you're that obsessed with things I have to say because you have nothing else to do, you're right, that's your prerogative. The reason you don't call him "Starbury" is because in Minnesota, Kevin Garentt and him were "KG and The Starbury Band"-in reference to KC and The Sunshine Band. That was over 10 years ago. But hey, after all... you think for yourself, right? That's why you believe (with your tunnel vision) that Kobe isn't a great player.
...if you could read, I was referring to the fact that without Kobe, the Lakers and the Grizzlies are evenly matched.The Lakers are probably worse, come to think of it. Kobe gave his teammates the chance to win it on their own by distributing the ball (so selfish of him) and allowing Smush to control the triangle offence with Luke Walton and Andrew Bynum.
I understood the point from the beginning. I was the one who pointed it out. If you want to read my post history, than please(!!!) do so. Read them again. Kobe plays with less-than adequate players and inexperienced youth.
...but hey, you think for yourself. Good luck with that.