Quote:
Originally Posted by OptimalTates
What a nonsense post. He was acting as a private citizen and not in any official capacity. He temporarily removed himself from the Commission to avoid any perception of conflict and the CPS requested EPS investigate for the same reason. The i's were dotted and the t's crossed. Now he can speak as though any other citizen should be able to, especially as a public figure that had it reported he was involved in an incident that is being investigated with no other information released. Otherwise, if his story is accurate, are we going to tell a victim of a crime that they can not speak out about it? Or even indicate that they are the victim? Absurd.
|
"If his story is accurate" being the operative words here. As a private citizen he shouldn't make any detailed public statements about it, because if his statement can be shown to be
inaccurate it'll be used against him.