Quote:
Originally Posted by Pointman
The last time US declared that another president has committed war crimes, they bombed his country (Iraq). I get Saddam didn't have nukes, but it appears to be the only thing that stops US from striking Moscow. Could US perform some kind of sabotage on Russian's nuclear weapons and then strike? Average men such as me don't really understand how it works and it's worries.
1. US is obviously itching to destroy Putin
2. The only thing that's stopping them is nukes
3. US secret service are very likely trying their best to undermine Putin's ability to nuke
4. US have their spies very close to Putin. Putin has been really scared by US intelligence, as evidenced by the fact that he has limited US embassy capacity some years ago because of their alleged spying activity.
5. Now what if by the end if the year US intelligence will figure out how to neutralize Russia's ability to nuke back? Then US blasts Moscow off map and be done with it.
I still think it's unlikely. But I no longer think it's impossible
|
The US can't take away Russia's ability to launch nukes. Their are ICBM silos all over the place, ones that can be launched from planes, and submarines all around the globe. The risk of not shutting down every one of those is too high. Bomb Moscow and miss one sub hanging out in the Pacific? Say goodbye to New York.
I get that your media is probably blasting this possibility out to scare you into understanding Putin's actions, but they are lying. Moscow isn't getting bombed unless Russia really really ####s up. And at that point, we are all ####ed.
Again, if I were you I'd be buying whatever I could while plentiful(including medications-you can barter these if you don't need them), have several escape plans mapped out, and be watching every source of western media I could get my hands on to know the facts. You may not need it, but preparation is key.