Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc
Well, this is a forum based on opinions. Let’s call them the points relevant to the current dispute. Can you find something in the wording that would contradict these points?
|
1. Once Player is fit to play
he must return, so the cap situation must be fixed.
vs.
2. Once Player is fit to play, the cap situation must be fixed
before Player can return.
Basically the same sentence, but subtle difference in where the action trigger is. We know the rule intends #1, but the wording is actually closer to #2.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
Heard on the radio that the tax difference between Vegas and Anaheim could be close to 900k for the duration of the contract. Could see why California is probably on his no trade list.
|
Sounds like really lazy napkin math that ignores reality (escrow, multi-jurisdictional tax, deductions on taxable income, marital status, etc.). Factoring all those things you're probably looking at closer to $280-350k in California state taxes next year - which is plenty reason enough for an NTC.