Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnski
Not to step on any Mod's toes, but to answer a couple of your questions, first, rep = skill... there is no difference. Those little boxes by your "Skill" indicator are your rep.
As indicated previously, blue is bad, red is good. If you want to see where you are on the bad side (considering the numerous blues you have) check here... (listed in order of worst rep/skill at #1 )
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/memberl...n&pp=30&page=1
By that indication, you are right down there with MF...
Now, as a NON point giver/taker, I find it funny that you want to know who is giving/taking away skill points. Does it matter? I think those folks have done a pretty darn good job when I look at the overall impact since this has started. Good bet that the bulk of the forum viewers are seeing your posts for what they appear to be. To you this should read that the likelyhood that people find your posts non-contributing should be pretty high.
Perhaps you should word your posts better if you think they are being misunderstood and are in fact contributing to this site in a positive manner.
My 1/10 of a cent.. after taxes. |
Thanks for taking the time to explain that, but I don't think it's your place.
To the mods, I disagree with the idea that it shouldn't matter who is giving you a skill point, or taking one away. If a member is given the responsibility of grading other posters, then they should also be accountable for that grade, and be able to justify it in a statement more detailed than "useless post"...or "Do not attack other members" (my personal favorite comment, given the post was not attacking anyone).